Access control evidence
Are devices locked and encrypted?
Klevely records disk-encryption and screen-lock status with timestamps. Screen lock is labelled as an access-control signal, not MFA.
ISO 27001 device evidence
ISO 27001 asks for managed security. Device proof is one place small firms get stuck.
Klevely gives timestamped evidence for endpoint posture: disk encryption, screen lock, OS updates, antivirus presence, and monitoring cadence. Use it to support ISO/IEC 27001 and vendor-security conversations where technical device controls need proof. It is not ISO certification, an ISMS, or a substitute for your Statement of Applicability.
Positioning
Not the certificate. The endpoint evidence behind the answer.
ISO/IEC 27001 is about an information security management system: people, process, technology, risk treatment, monitoring, review, and continual improvement. Klevely does one narrow job inside that larger system.
When a client, partner, auditor, or internal lead asks how devices are controlled and monitored, Klevely gives you current evidence instead of a spreadsheet, a memory, or a screenshot chase.
Where it fits
Use Klevely where ISO 27001 turns into endpoint questions.
Secure configuration
Are endpoints kept current?
Klevely checks OS update status so you can show whether enrolled devices are current at the time of the report.
Monitoring
Can you show recent checks?
The agent checks posture every 15 minutes while running, giving you a live ledger instead of a one-off screenshot.
Assessment answers
Can you support the claim?
Use the report and answer sheet when vendor forms ask about encryption, patching, endpoint protection, and monitoring.
Guardrails
What Klevely does not claim.
Klevely is not an ISO/IEC 27001 certification body, not an auditor, not an ISMS platform, and not a Statement of Applicability generator.
It gives scoped device-posture evidence that may support the technological-control part of your own ISO 27001 work, depending on your ISMS scope, risks, selected controls, and auditor or customer expectations.
What is at stake
ISO language gets abstract. Vendor questions get very specific.
How could this affect us directly?
A client or partner may ask for security evidence before approving access, renewing a contract, or sending sensitive data. Unsupported answers can slow deals and make a small firm look less controlled than it is.
Can this help with ISO 27001 certification?
It can support evidence for endpoint/device posture where that is in your ISMS scope and selected controls. It does not certify you, design your ISMS, write your policies, run risk assessment, or guarantee auditor acceptance.
Is this only for companies already pursuing ISO 27001?
No. Many small firms see ISO 27001 language inside client security questionnaires long before they run a formal certification project. Klevely helps answer the device-security slice with evidence.
What should we say in a questionnaire?
Say what the evidence actually supports: enrolled devices are checked for encryption, screen lock, OS update status, antivirus presence, and monitoring cadence. Do not claim ISO certification or full compliance from Klevely alone.
Next step
Turn the endpoint part into evidence.
Use the $49 pack when one assessment needs a device-evidence answer. Use monthly monitoring if ISO 27001, vendor reviews, or client security questionnaires are going to keep coming back.