Friction point
The questions are always the same
Encryption, screen lock, patching, antivirus, monitoring cadence, and proof on request.
Klevely
Security questionnaire evidence
Use Klevely when a client, carrier, or vendor form asks whether devices are encrypted, locked, patched, protected, and monitored. The pack gives you 30 days of checks, a timestamped report, and a device-security answer sheet.
Why this page exists
The form is usually not asking for a speech. It wants specific answers, and the safest answers are the ones backed by current evidence.
The fast path is the $49 pack: pay once, install the agent, let it collect posture evidence, then use the answer sheet for the device-security section. Monthly monitoring is there if they want the live dashboard after that.
The fit
Friction point
Encryption, screen lock, patching, antivirus, monitoring cadence, and proof on request.
Evidence
Attach a current report instead of screenshots gathered after the fact.
Answer sheet
Use the pack answer sheet to fill the device-security section with caveats already included.
Scope
No MFA claim, no EDR claim, no full compliance claim. Just the device evidence you actually have.
Scope
Klevely produces device-posture evidence for the access-controls and monitoring elements of the FTC Safeguards Rule, 16 CFR 314.4(c)-(d). It is not a certification and it is not a substitute for the full written information security program.
Screen lock is labelled as an access control, not MFA. Antivirus presence is labelled as a baseline signal, not EDR. That honesty is the point: the evidence is useful because it is specific.
Common asks
Thirty days of monitoring for up to five devices, a timestamped evidence report, and a device-security answer sheet.
Yes, for endpoint/device questions such as encryption, patch status, antivirus presence, and monitoring cadence.
No. It supports the device-security section. Policies, risk assessment, MFA, EDR, and incident response remain separate.
After checkout, the setup page provides the enrollment token, install link, dashboard link, and answer sheet immediately.
What is at stake
If a client, carrier, examiner, or reviewer asks for device-security proof and you cannot show it, you may lose time chasing screenshots, delay a renewal or deal, and look less prepared than the work you actually do.
Financial penalties and remediation costs are possible in broader regulatory failures, but Klevely should not be treated as penalty insurance. It helps with the evidence for device access controls and monitoring, which is one part of a wider security program.
It replaces unsupported claims with a timestamped report. That matters when the person reading your answer is deciding whether your firm looks controlled, current, and serious with financial data.
Next step
Use the $49 pack when you need one focused answer sheet and 30 days of device-posture evidence. Keep monthly monitoring if this becomes a recurring client, carrier, or Safeguards review problem.